If you have spare time to engage in public opinion the discussion seems all over the places here.

No words about battery consumption comparison between the 255H, 155H, 285H and 185H.

This may help “How to Use Steam on Linux (Some Hacking Required)”

https://spectra.video/videos/watch/06cb0ef3-9944-477c-8efa-725ad228ff53

The idea is the opposite, to not rely in MS for Secure Boot. True that they created the secure boot but not because they created that is a bad idea. Many Linux distributions support Secure Boot through their own signing keys or by using tools like Shim (Ubuntu, Fedora, Debian, OpenSuse, Arch, Gentoo and NixOS), allowing us to maintain control and security without depending on Microsoft. Secure Boot is a security feature that ensures your computer boots only trusted software, reducing the risk of malware. It checks the signatures of boot software and only allows signed, trusted components to load. This helps protect your system from unauthorized access during startup. Not flawless but is better with than without. Also, along with other strategies it may some day be used by the gaming vendors as a potential via to validate anti cheat. Recently the systemd made some progress in the area enhancing the TPM config.

https://lwn.net/Articles/1001730/

“the TPM PCRs could be used either to lock a disk-encryption key to only be used on kernels signed by a particular OS vendor, or to lock a disk-encryption key to specific local things, such as the firmware version, available hardware, etc. Now, with systemd 257, the user can configure both these kinds of requirements at once.”

Genuine question, doesn’t PopOS requires to disable secure boot to install? Not a big fan of distros that request it

It kind makes sense, the Stem Deck is like more of a tablet/laptop size than of a handheld

That was my thought and honest it doesn’t offset, CO2 emissions are probably worst for the planet at this moment.

I’m not even sure that they are aware that they did something environmentally good, probably is not a good idea to let them know, 'cause there is some chance that they decide revert it. If there are no financial gains they probably aren’t interested.

This is a criticism to their government not their people.

Lol

Thanks

Hahaha… I’m not gonna lie, you probably nailed my current state

What about LinkedIn? Is people jumping out of it?

All good, it is not past tense. Just felt joy about that thought and felt that should share somewhere.