I still think his point could have been made twice as convincingly through the magic of buying two of them
I still think his point could have been made twice as convincingly through the magic of buying two of them
I eat tuna often, and I’ve never noticed anyone that can’t draw separate conclusions based entirely for reasons without cause or makes little sense. Evidence of heavy metal caused features resemble natural pathways just fine. It’s like spending worry about higher lead or cadmium. Who does it?
Seems pretty good for 1.1 x .9, and for .9 x .8
I guess values must be pretty close
I can’t imagine that 3 years of data is even remotely enough for this. I have articles of clothing that are decades old (3+ decades old), but I have never bought any piece of clothing expecting it to last that long, and the clothing that lasts isn’t always the type that I’d expect. At best, 3 years is enough for a “snapshot” of the life of most clothing, I would think.
Then again, I’ve owned the same car for the last 21 years, so maybe I am not a typical consumer.
After some thought, I’ve decided that we should refer to this apparent lapse by journalists as “Oceangate-gate-gate”
After decades of journalists attaching the suffix “gate” to anything even remotely scandalous, I was disappointed that I never heard anyone embrace the full stupidity of this practice by referring to this story as “Oceangate-gate”
resources
Your tax dollars at work
Were any of them any good?
deleted by creator
… something something even war criminals right twice a day
If we could just work out how to efficiently mill waste plastic into 15 μm or so sizes, we’d then be able to mix the plastics directly into our wheat flours and whey protein powders. Why try to beat plastic when we could just become plastic?
I bet they all got paid though
I know. Nothing stresses me out more than weighing mice
Yeah. I was in Hawaii when 9/11 happened, and of course all flights at the time were canceled for days. It wasn’t a bad place to be stuck for a little while, but even that short of a delay in returning did cause a few issues.
Eventually, they became confident that they were working with new material from two fragmentary Euripides plays, Polyidus and Ino. Twenty-two of the lines were previously known in slightly varied versions, but “80 percent was brand-new stuff,” Gibert says.
This cleared up my first thought: how can you tell the lost writings of Euripides from the lost writings of Sophocles (or from the writings of playwrights that haven’t survived at all). I mean, unless these are sizeable fragments, it might not be easy to tell even Aeschylus from Euripides
It is sad that on any topic concerning South America, I am suspicious of anything that the US says.
We had a Saudi prince in custody?
We had the Sears version. Just not as cool