• qjkxbmwvz@startrek.website
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      Yeah I always assumed “bug” was like “vegetable” — it’s a colloquial, not taxonomic, term. But there are “true bugs” so maybe the analogy isn’t completely sound.

      (And tomato is absolutely a vegetable.)

      • dh34d@lemmynsfw.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 months ago

        They’re culinary vegetables. My wife likes to say it like this: intelligence is knowing that a tomato is a fruit, wisdom is knowing that it doesn’t go in a fruit salad.

  • chetradley@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    2 months ago

    The number one rule for pedants is: if you’re going to be pedantic, you’d damn well better be correct.

  • AVincentInSpace@pawb.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    2 months ago
    1. there is no scientific definition of “bug”. the entire category is a social construct much like vegetables
    2. this person’s first sentence defined spiderd as insects and the second sentence said they weren’t
    • NeverNudeNo13@lemmings.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      They are missing some punctuation where it was desperately needed but imagine a comma or period after " spiders are not bugs" and reread.

        • NeverNudeNo13@lemmings.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          2 months ago

          All good my dude… It didn’t make sense to me on my first past either so I figured that it might have gotten you in the same spot too. Just glad to see the community is not throwing down votes at ya anymore, because your comment just felt like an honest misread. Cheers.