カニ風 [she/they]@lemmy.blahaj.zone to Science Memes@mander.xyzEnglish · 2 months agoa very emphatic answerlemmy.blahaj.zoneimagemessage-square50fedilinkarrow-up1503
arrow-up1503imagea very emphatic answerlemmy.blahaj.zoneカニ風 [she/they]@lemmy.blahaj.zone to Science Memes@mander.xyzEnglish · 2 months agomessage-square50fedilink
minus-squareLeviathan@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up56·2 months agoThrow up some brackets, you rage-baiting motherfucker!
minus-squareFiniteBanjo@lemmy.todaylinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up32·2 months agoNo actually the trick to this one is that Four-Factorial equals 24 So 40 - 16 = 24
minus-squareMBM@lemmings.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up18·2 months agoThis one’s perfectly unambiguous without brackets, unlike the 1/2x stuff
minus-square💡𝚂𝗆𝖺𝗋𝗍𝗆𝖺𝗇 𝙰𝗉𝗉𝗌📱@programming.devlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·2 months ago1/2x is also unambiguous. 2a=(2xa) by definition. Has done for at least 180 years. Terms
Throw up some brackets, you rage-baiting motherfucker!
No actually the trick to this one is that Four-Factorial equals 24
So 40 - 16 = 24
Aha! Fair enough.
This one’s perfectly unambiguous without brackets, unlike the 1/2x stuff
1/2x is also unambiguous. 2a=(2xa) by definition. Has done for at least 180 years. Terms