• BrotherL0v3@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    117
    ·
    4 days ago

    Fun facts!

    85% of people arrested with fentanyl at the border as U.S. citizens.

    The vast majority of people arrested here for trafficking children are U.S. citizens (and children are over 3x more likely to be trafficked by an acquaintance or relative than they are a random kidnapper).

    “Illegal aliens” commit less crime than natural born U.S. citizens.

    Violent immigrants, perverted trans people, and incompetent DEI hires are all moral panics. You hear so much about them because the Republican party has nothing to offer that will make your life safer or easier.

    • PlaidBaron@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      23
      ·
      4 days ago

      Shut the border down to all Americans until they can control their criminals. They arent sending their best.

    • Devanismyname@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      4 days ago

      They’ve made a business out of selling panic and fear to the masses. Betraying their own people for money. Never trust a conservative politician or business person.

    • Eatspancakes84@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      3 days ago

      It’s also just missing the point entirely. The US is primarily responsible for ensuring that illegal substances do not cross its borders. The much, much more logical response by the US to this threat would be to increase searches of vehicles crossing the border. Obviously, we would still have to pretend that a drug as compact as fentanyl can in fact be stopped effectively, but in any case securing the border from the US’ side is not Canada’s responsibility.

    • Oyml77@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      4 days ago

      Facts only matter to people who understand that facts are real and measurable things and not opinions and feelings.

  • Alloi@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    3 days ago

    my assumption is that he wants a guy like that to assist in the operations of a new american run private cartel network, after they have ousted mexican cartels who cant be reasoned with to give up their profits to the US Oligarchs and private contract groups. they get a chance to install their own american run mexican cartel in mexico, and take over their drug trade for private funding operations. it would explain the 3000 troops they sent to the southern boarder, among other “official” reason.

    this guy will help them with connecting with private sellers, to private clients, and logistics. im also assuming that this “new silk road” will be heavily monitored under the guise of decentralization and privacy, for use in things like blackmail, and coercion of users. or simply to attack other drug trade networks by undermining their image and pricing.

    but what do i know? im just some guy in a bathtub.

    • Hochiiplox@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 day ago

      This tracks given his posts the other day about “the US beginning the crypto capital of the world”

      It’s all about to become some dark enlightenment bullshit

  • whoisearth@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    24
    ·
    3 days ago

    I love that out minister Joly flat out told CNN, and I’m paraphrasing, “if we are being honest America is a net exporter of immigrants and drugs to Canada. Don’t lie and say this is about drugs or immigrants it isn’t. It’s about destroying the Canadian economy so you can annex us for everything that makes us one of the most desired countries in the world to live.”

    Seriously fuck America

    • BobGnarley@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      3 days ago

      America is also the number one consumer of drugs worldwide.

      But I bet you won’t see any of that money flowing to help that side of the problem.

      Just more boots to the door and guns in your faces while we take all your shit and auction it off while you’re locked up. Its sick.

  • cowfodder@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    105
    ·
    edit-2
    4 days ago

    Did this stupid mother fucker really refer to the Prime Minister of Canada as “governor”? Can’t tell if pushing the 51st state bullshit or he’s just that fucking dumb!

    • HappySkullsplitter@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      91
      ·
      4 days ago

      He thinks speaking diminutively to people automatically puts him in a position of power over them

      It’s an insecurity issue common with bullying

      • Laurel Raven@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        3 days ago

        I wish people would start responding by referring to him as “washed up reality TV personality Trump”, or even better, “convinced felon Trump”

        It’s great because unlike “Governor Trudeau”, it’s actually true

    • RedditWanderer@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      74
      ·
      edit-2
      4 days ago

      He has been for a while now, which is actually a violation of the US’ nato obligations. But who care anymore, the US is no longer an ally.

      Edit: it also violates a ton of border treaties, and half a doze international agreements the US has benefited from for a long time. But just with NATO:

      Key points of the treaty

      • The parties agree to settle disputes peacefully
      • The parties agree to refrain from using force in a way that goes against the United Nations’ goals
      • The parties agree to consider an attack on one of them as an attack on all of them
      • The parties agree to consult about threats and defense matters
      • The parties agree to safeguard the freedom, common heritage, and civilization of their peoples
      • The parties agree to promote stability and well-being in the North Atlantic area

      Threatening Canada violates all of these and then some.

    • papertowels@mander.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      3 days ago

      It’s the new “we’ll build a wall, and mexico will pay for it” - a clause so dumb that people will complain about that, unknowingly tugging “normalcy” a step in that direction.

    • mkwt@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      edit-2
      4 days ago

      Canada at least has a “Governor-General” who is appointed by the British monarch.

      Edit: like several other commonwealth states, Canada is a completely separate country from the United Kingdom. It just happens, by law, that King Charles III is the king of all of them.

      • Kecessa@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        4 days ago

        When talking about what Charles III is doing in relation to Canada in his position a king, we’re supposed to refer to him as the monarch of Canada, we just don’t tend to do it because he doesn’t live here full time.

        • mkwt@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          4 days ago

          Look, when the King of Canada, or his Governor General, perform official acts for Canada, they use the Great Seal of Canada, not the Great Seal of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland. It’s totally different, I promise.

    • SippyCup@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      4 days ago

      Carpet bomb them with inaccuracies and they’ll spend too much time correcting you to keep up.

  • BilboBargains@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    24
    ·
    3 days ago

    Pardoning Ulbricht is the incredibly thin silver lining of Trump’s presidency. These drug war advocates talk like they really believe this problem can be solved with criminal justice, meanwhile they defund harm reduction education and make healthcare inaccessible. It’s diabolical.

    • Phoenicianpirate@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      3 days ago

      Ulbricht was a sack of shit. He tried to hire several hitmen to kill agents investigating his stuff. He isn’t someone you want to get behind.

      • technocrit@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        edit-2
        3 days ago

        He tried to hire several hitmen federal agents to kill agents investigating his stuff.

        In Ross’ defense people should defend themselves from violent prohibitionists who lock encage, torture, and murder people.

        Prohibitionists are the true sacks of shit. Endlessly profiting from drugs and violence.

        • Hominine@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          3 days ago

          …prohibiting the sale of child pornography, weapons, and drugs. But I see you’re neatly setting some of these aside.

        • Phoenicianpirate@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          3 days ago

          Dude he hired FBI agents whom he thought were hitmen. If he knew they were Feds he would not have done it.

          I believe in lifting prohibitions on drugs. But that doesn’t make people like Ross stand up guys. He is genuine sack of human shit.

      • BilboBargains@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        3 days ago

        The war on drugs is not ethical and the very last people I will get behind are law enforcement. The case against Ulbricht was a tissue of lies and fabrication.

    • Professorozone@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      3 days ago

      I had never heard of him or the Silk Road. I just looked it up and it seems like there was some benefit to creating a place where people could find drugs without the dangerous human encounters that can happen during these sales but it also said that the site was used to trade in illegal weapons, hacking tools and tutorials, hit men for hire and other unlawful goods and services. Doesn’t sound like much of a silver lining to me. More like an aluminum lining.

  • Anivia@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    3 days ago

    As much as I hate Trump, I don’t think this is the “gotcha” it is being portraied as by this tweet. Silk Road was one of the best things to happen for the “safer use” movement of all time. The ability to not have to deal with shady street dealers and order from darknet suppliers on a platform that had legitimate reviews and an escrow system was a huge improvement to the safety of drugs users. It meant a much lower risk of contaminated drugs or getting scammed out of your money.

    Of course Ross allegedly also attempted to hire a hitman, which is how he got caught, cause the hitman was an undercover agent, so he allegedly is not a good guy regardless of how you think about him helping people get access to cleaner drugs, but that’s besides the point the author of the tweet is trying to make

    • Doomsider@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      3 days ago

      People died from overdoses not to mention lots more ruined lives. I get you like the idea of drugs that are safer to order but that does not make it a good thing.

      Also lots of child pornography, murder for hire, human trafficking, and all kinds of other shitty things took place. So yeah, not exactly a good thing.

      • Kahless@infosec.pub
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        3 days ago

        Silk Road did not offer child pornography, weapons, people or hitman services. Ross Ulbricht did not hire a hitman to kill his roommate. He was framed by the FBI and the roommate was coerced into helping stage the murder. The roommate later appologized and tried to get Ulbricht out of prison. Don’t believe all the propaganda. Drugs are dangerous, but law inforcement is always more dangerous.

        • Doomsider@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          3 days ago

          Only 70% of purchases were drug related. I find it fascinating people triy to defend this garbage human being. Did he purposely offer hitman, weapons, and CP? Perhaps not, but there is no doubt these things took place on this site as they take place on every site. The difference is of course he profited from these interactions taking a cut of drugs and “other” services.

          I get it though, law enforcement is worse than the drug dealer that got your little sister hooked on fentanyl leading to her death.

      • technocrit@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        3 days ago

        lots of child pornography, murder for hire, human trafficking,

        Are you talking about silk road? Is this some lib conspiracy that I haven’t heard? I think you need to read something based in reality.

      • Crikeste@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        3 days ago

        People die from overdoses every day without the Silk Road so I don’t know where you get off making that argument.

        And in what world is safer drugs NOT a good thing?

        And I’m pretty sure every social media service has had problems with everything you listed at the bottom.

        • Doomsider@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          3 days ago

          When someone facilitates the selling of illicit unregulated substances that cause the death of others they are often held responsible. Pretty sure that’s how it is supposed to work.

          I get it, you want to have an illegal unregulated illicit drug market and you don’t care who it harms. Pretty sure that makes you a POS unless I am missing something.

          • ArcaneSlime@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            20
            ·
            4 days ago

            Your choice, I won’t force you to read it, keep spreading misinformation all you want. It’s there for any who actually want to learn about his case and find out those charges were dropped and the agents convicted themselves.

            • turnip@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              6
              ·
              4 days ago

              I love that the left loves the war on drugs just to own the conservatives. The two are more alike than they think.

              • Lemminary@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                8
                ·
                4 days ago

                First time hearing that I like the war on drugs that I’ve so violently despised my entire life to fulfill a petty political agenda.

                I’m glad we have you here to correctly interpret what we think and believe! I bet you have many more similar gold nuggets that you can pull out of your colon.

              • technocrit@lemmy.dbzer0.com
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                edit-2
                3 days ago

                The left opposes the state and its violent prohibition.

                The libs, tankies, fascists, etal who support prohibition… They’re right-wing.

              • ArcaneSlime@lemmy.dbzer0.com
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                5
                ·
                4 days ago

                Before pardon: Free Ross

                Wrong president does it: Wait akshully the corrupt cops that were convicted were right even though he was acquitted of those charges for lack of evidence!

                Fucking mind boggling. Like fuck me I don’t like the annoying orange either but this was the right move, he never should have been in jail (at all, end the drug war, but…) especially not “for life” for the crime of running a website.

                And free fucking Snowden while we’re here, goddamn.

      • Liamk57@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        4 days ago

        For the whole drug exchange platform fair enough it might have beeneoverkill. But we are still talking about a guy who was up for killing people on his way. Not sure they are the best for society

    • Petter1@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      3 days ago

      Yea, there are so many other guys, that he pardoned, which are way worse…

  • Kahless@infosec.pub
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    3 days ago

    Ross Ulbricht’s release was a deal with the Libertarians for their endorsement. Silk Road did not offer weapons and he did not hire a criminal to murder anyone. The FBI staged the whole thing. They forced his old roommate to pose as a murder victim. He later appoligized. A pretty messy affair and Ulbricht’s release is justified. Even though Trump only did it to gain Libertarian votes.

  • FreakinSteve@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    3 days ago

    I also want to point out that when whites are addicts, they go after the dealers. When blacks are addicted, they go after the users

  • technocrit@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    3 days ago

    If any of these worthless politicians actually gave a shit about drug abuse, they would end prohibition and offer basic social services.

    Never gonna happen regardless of the politician’s brand.

    • 100_kg_90_de_belin@feddit.it
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      3 days ago

      All research and successful drug policy shows that treatment should be increased and law enforcement decreased while abolishing mandatory minimum sentences

      • killingspark@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        edit-2
        3 days ago

        I will never understand how ruining someones life because they are using drugs is supposed to help them get off of drugs.

        Edit: don’t get me wrong, it’s great that this has been researched, but it seems so obvious.

  • iiinnnn@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    3 days ago

    Pardoning him was however a good thing, given price gouging regarding medications

    • prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      1 day ago

      What does that have to do with Ulbrecht??

      Edit: to be clear, darknet markets still exist, and never stopped existing. You don’t need to pardon someone convicted of attempted murder for this.

      • Katana314@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        3 days ago

        I’m going to guess there were prescription meds available on SR. The danger is, if they weren’t going through FDA or any oversight, it’s very possible they were some other “mix” containing addictive substances.

        • prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 day ago

          Sure, but darknet markets never stopped existing. You don’t need this one loser to be out of prison for these things to exist (and they probably function better without him)

  • Darkassassin07@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    24
    ·
    4 days ago

    Worse; you could buy people from the silk road. Wives, children, nanny’s slaves… Along with military equipment, drugs ofc, stolen goods, and pretty much anything illegal that has a buyer.

    Had a friend that liked buying drugs there, and would send me screenshots of some of the insane ads he found. He was pissed when it got shut down, and moved to a market called ‘Agora’.

    Broke off that friendship quite a while ago and haven’t heard about it since. Not really my scene…

    • Lowpast@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      21
      ·
      4 days ago

      False, no human trafficking, cp, or hitmen services were allowed and were promptly removed, except when Ross him self tried to buy one. Obviously people attempted to hide their sales, just like they do in the clearnet, but the site had a policy against many things.

      • Darkassassin07@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        4 days ago

        Maybe they weren’t permitted/encouraged, and eventually got removed, but you could definitely find them there. I wish I’d saved images; but this was 15years ago.

    • glimse@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      21
      ·
      4 days ago

      This isn’t true, there was no category for buying human beings. I don’t even think hitmen were allowed to offer their services.

      Military equipment and stolen goods, absolutely. Hacked accounts, too. But any ad he found was either promptly removed or was never on The Silk Road to begin with.

      Other non-drug markets did exist at the time but I never went on them so I can’t confirm if they were selling slaves.

      • Darkassassin07@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        4 days ago

        I wish I’d have saved some of those images; I can assure you they did exist. I don’t think it was a prominent part of the site, with their main focus on illegal substances/goods, but it was definitely there.

        • glimse@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          14
          ·
          4 days ago

          Someone who definitely wasn’t me often browsed the whole site in awe at what was sold and never saw anything like that

          I’m not saying he didn’t find them, but I am very confident it would have been against the ToS. The admins had a pretty hard line stance on it because it would take the site from “very illegal” to “extremely illegal”

          • ERROR: Earth.exe has crashed@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            4 days ago

            Innocent until proven guilty.

            By that logic, trump is “innocent” of treason.

            Just because it hasn’t been proven yet, doesn’t mean the accused didn’t do it. We are not judges, we don’t have to be impartial.

            • technocrit@lemmy.dbzer0.com
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              4
              ·
              edit-2
              3 days ago

              By that logic, trump is “innocent” of treason.

              According to the state, he is absolutely innocent.

              Gotta remember there are at least two definitions of “justice”: the state’s version and common sense. They are almost never the same.

            • ArcaneSlime@lemmy.dbzer0.com
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              4
              ·
              4 days ago

              Well due to double jeopardy he can’t be tried again for the crime he’s already been acquitted for due to lack of evidence and police corruption, but you’re free to lick any boot you wish, and judge people based on all the untrue lies directly from the police you want to, it’s understandable!

              I’m assuming you also believe police like Derek Chauvin then, since he was also convicted and convicted corrupt cops are somehow trustworthy to you? No? Well by all means believe these corrupt cops and not those corrupt cops, corrupt cops can be right twice a day or whatever, even when they’re stealing millions of dollars of bitcoin from the guy they’re fabricating evidence against, that doesn’t mean that the fabricated evidence is fabricated!

              Why is there no “jerk off with eye roll” emoji? The world needs it.

              • ERROR: Earth.exe has crashed@lemmy.dbzer0.com
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                3
                ·
                4 days ago

                Well due to double jeopardy he can’t be tried again for the crime

                Jan 6 insurrectionists got pardoned. Do you think they are “innocent”?

                Fucking no, they are still traitors.

                free to lick any boot you wish

                So… like bootlicking your daddy trump and his illegitimate pardons?

                I’m assuming you also believe police like Derek Chauvin then, since he was also convicted and convicted corrupt cops are somehow trustworthy to you?

                ???

                Dude mudered an innocent black man on camera? What are you talking about?

                • ArcaneSlime@lemmy.dbzer0.com
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  6
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  4 days ago

                  No no, you misunderstand the circumstances. He wasn’t pardoned for the “murder for hire” charges, those got dropped. Years ago actually, quietly, after they were used to unfairly influence the case he was convicted in which the charges were “engaging in a continuing criminal enterprise, conspiracy to distribute narcotics, conspiracy to commit money laundering, conspiracy to traffic fraudulent identity documents, and conspiracy to commit computer hacking.” For those charges he was convicted on all counts and sentenced to life in prison without the possibility of parole, but after that case ended the other case with the murder for hire charges was dropped for lack of evidence and police corruption in the case (and the cops themselves were actually convicted.) He can’t have been pardoned for a crime which he was never convicted in the first place. Not only that but the charges were dropped “with prejudice,” which means the court has looked at the merits of the case and made a final determination that the case should not move forward. The prosecutor is barred from refiling the charges at any future point.

                  The Jan 6th guys however were convicted of their charges, just as Ross was convicted of “engaging in a continuing criminal enterprise, conspiracy to distribute narcotics, conspiracy to commit money laundering, conspiracy to traffic fraudulent identity documents, and conspiracy to commit computer hacking” and so basically “no they were convicted, Ross wasn’t but was overcharged for other crimes which he was convicted for.”

                  Look at it this way, if I’m a cop, and I just know you committed a murder, I’m damn sure of it, but I have no real evidence except for some stuff I fabricated, and then you get arrested for selling weed, I don’t think it should be legal for me to put you away for life for the charge of selling weed “because I toootally know you did that murder I don’t have evidence for.” Basically that’s what happened to Ross boiled down.

                  You may think someone deserves to die in prison for “engaging in a continuing criminal enterprise, conspiracy to distribute narcotics, conspiracy to commit money laundering, conspiracy to traffic fraudulent identity documents, and conspiracy to commit computer hacking,” but I don’t, call me a progressive idk.

                  No no more like the boot licking you’re doing to the corrupt cops that were actually convicted for being corrupt. Wild choice but it’s yours to make. Meanwhile I’m “bootlicking” for that super dangerous…checks notes…webdev. Real scary guy that one.

                  I’m talking about your defense of convicted corrupt cops. Camera or not they were sent to prison and yet here you are parroting their lies, why?

          • go $fsck yourself@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            4 days ago

            “Innocent until proven guilty” doesn’t exonerate a person from personal judgement based on facts simply because they have not been convicted in a court of law.

            Edit -

            Also, just because a case has been dropped doesn’t mean they weren’t guilty. Based on evidence, it’s more than reasonable to state he attempted to have someone assassinated.

            You’re also going to need to provide more supporting information than a single article that’s a clear opinion piece written by a business that is biased towards supporting Ulbricht. You also share this bias being an apparent libertarian yourself, which could imply you cherry-picked this article.

            Not that I can’t change my mind, but that one link ain’t gonna do it.

              • go $fsck yourself@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                edit-2
                4 days ago

                There is evidence, though. I provided a reputable source that states such. So, you’re just misrepresenting my point.

                The government also presented evidence that DPR commissioned the murders of five people to protect Silk Road’s anonymity

                • ArcaneSlime@lemmy.dbzer0.com
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  3
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  4 days ago

                  https://www.justice.gov/usao-sdny/pr/silk-road-drug-vendor-who-claimed-commit-murders-hire-silk-road-founder-ross-ulbricht

                  Yes, the allegations of a drug dealer who was himself caught are very reliable indeed, even though the case was dismissed due to lack of evidence and the agents charged with corruption involved with the case, we should believe the corrupt cops and cornered rat over the other guy and he should rot in prison forever for the thing that was dismissed due to lack of evidence and corruption, JUSTICE!

                  Btw, while this source backs your claim (that I never disputed) that he was accused of these crimes, you’re gonna hate this part:

                  The charges contained in the Indictment are merely accusations, and the defendant is presumed innocent unless and until proven guilty.

                  Now where have I heard that before? Oh yeah when I said it (among other places.) Interestingly enough the whole “proven guilty” part is the bit that never happened.

    • Hawk@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      3 days ago

      The same people that keep complaining about Trump supporters defending him no matter what keep making the same mental gymnastics to defend Ross Ulbricht without realizing.

      No idea why people keep defending him, he’s a piece of shit that should’ve stayed behind bars.

    • ayyy@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      4 days ago

      The guy is an idiot that saw dollars and let his brain shut down. No wonder Trump looks up to him.