• Cryophilia@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    2 days ago

    They didn’t promise much of anything, only that “well, we’re not Trump so vote for us!”.

    Is that not enough? You prefer Trump to not-Trump?

    • WoodScientist@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      1 day ago

      Is that not enough? You prefer Trump to not-Trump?

      People are tired of this shit. Democrats have been running on this for 20 years at this point. We’re at the point where people would rather see Trump dismantle the entire federal government than vote for one more Democrat promising, that this time, they actually will make meaningful change.

      People are just done with this. Democrats have repeatedly failed to make government work for people. If government won’t work for people, why would people care if Trump’s going to come in and tear everything down?

    • hark@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      1 day ago

      That’s like presenting only the options of slavery or indentured servitude and asking “you prefer slavery to indentured servitude?” Neither are acceptable. Before you say “well those are the options we’ve got” think about who are making these the only options.

      • Cryophilia@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 day ago

        The system itself is only able to give you two options. It’s not an evil conspiracy, it’s a Prisoner’s Dilemma. If Democratic states, and Democratic states alone, eliminated first-past-the-post…we would be under permanent Republican rule. It’s political suicide.

        • Oyml77@lemmy.today
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          2 days ago

          It was enough for me. It was not enough for people who heard one guy talking about issues that mattered to them (albeit by offering bullshit solutions that don’t actually address the problems) and another saying “well, we aren’t that guy and everything is getting better” when people felt like it wasn’t getting better for them. There was not enough of a positive platform presented for progressives to support and too much targeting of Republicans that don’t like Trump. They obviously targeted the wrong audience.

        • Boomer Humor Doomergod@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          2 days ago

          If you assume American voters are rational and educated then, yes, it should be enough.

          But you know what they say about making assumptions: It makes an ass out of U and gets a fascist elected.

    • venotic@kbin.melroy.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      2 days ago

      Is it too much to ask for America to have someone who’s only quality is that they’re not Trump? How about credulous capability? How about a spine to tell corporations to shove it? How about an actual move to progress things that should’ve been apparent in the present X amount of years ago?

      Simply just not being Trump is not enough. Because what you do not care to realize, is that sets a low bar. You’re saying, you’re okay with someone not Trump even though they may not be any better. Don’t mix my words around, idiot.

    • CosmicTurtle0@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      2 days ago

      Democrats fall in love. Republicans fall in line.

      In other words: Republicans will consistently vote for anyone with an R. Democrats need to be convinced to vote for their candidate.

      • Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        7 hours ago

        Democrats fall in love. Republicans fall in line.

        democrats know this. They keep giving us candidates that only the corporate/genocide wing of the party loves and ordering everyone else to fall in line.

      • conditional_soup@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        1 day ago

        I don’t think so. In 2016, while the DNC kept their thumb on the scale for Clinton, the RNC saw voters actually turning out for Trump and let them do it. I remember getting the vibe that they weren’t happy with it, that they really preferred Jeb Bush or some other long standing party man, but at least when their voters spoke up, the Republicans didn’t try to fight them. The shrugged and went, “well, alright”.

        Had they put their thumb on the scale for a boring establishment candidate like Jeb or Kasich, it seems to me that Hillary’s chances would have been much better if only for the fact that a lot of unexcited Republicans would have stayed home on election night. I’ve never voted for a Republican, I’ve been hearing “it’s the most important election ever, you’re just going to have to compromise and try to get what you want next time” since 2012. I’ve reliably turned out and voted for the democrats in every election except 2020 [Voted for Jorgensen. Relax, I’m in California, I knew the state would go for Biden, I was just hoping to try and get another party a seat at the table by giving them a bigger slice of the popular vote]. I’m tired of voting for the lesser evil, boss. I’m ready to vote FOR something again.