Will Chris win?

  • SamC@lemmy.nz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    21
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Looks very unlikely there will be any other result besides National/ACT majority. Without having to worry about other coalition partners, this will probably be our most right-wing government of the MMP era. A lot of the National caucus are pretty right-wing at heart (rather than Labour, where a lot of them are pretty centrist at heart). So ACT will probably get more wins out of the coalition agreement than you might expect. NACT should be able to keep the government running smoothly as it was under Key, meaning they will be odds on to win a second and probably third term.

    Which means cost of living, inequality and environment/climate issues are all set to get substantially worse.

      • SamC@lemmy.nz
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        13
        ·
        1 year ago

        It was about that, but Labour were terrible at convincing the NZ public that they were better than National on those issues.

        • Mojojojo1993@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          11
          ·
          1 year ago

          Labour have done a horrendous job. They deserve this. But it will Royaly fuck the poor.

          Not looking forward to the next 3 years.

          • HappycamperNZ@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            9
            ·
            1 year ago

            Im just reminding myself that regardless of who is at the helm, things aren’t going to get better in the next 3 years. NZ has lacked decades of investment and so small that we are at the wim of Aus, Europe, China and US. National may give our country a bit of strength, but it won’t be stronger people and I doubt they will be looking ahead.

            • Mojojojo1993@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              7
              ·
              1 year ago

              Rolling back environmental policies and landlord tax will be pretty bad for all of us. I don’t think strength is anything we require. Nobody is worried of an armed New Zealand.

              • HappycamperNZ@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                3
                ·
                1 year ago

                Clarification - economic strength, (business) investment, population and tech. Soft power, not hard power, but saying that I’m in Defense studies and the asia-pacific region is having significant concerns with hard power and we have a massive EEZ. Moot point though, back to mine.

                Our country needs significant financial investment - we love this country but we are soo far behind in soo many ways. Labour has tried to offset things like cost of living, housing, health but there is soo much to do.

                • Mojojojo1993@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  5
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  Business in my opinion. My very very controversial opinion. Business is a cancer. It’s the worst thing to happen to humanity since money was invented.

                  Business looks to squeeze everything to profit the few. Maybe stop looking to greed and start getting the basics. Housing food security.

                  You can rape pillage and destroy the planet for profit. Won’t help.yhe majority though.

                  But that’s just my incorrect opinion

        • HappycamperNZ@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          1 year ago

          Thats disappointing as I don’t think national gives a shit at all. I suspect the tax cuts with the current cost of living got national through, but it does nothing to move the country ahead.

          • Dave@lemmy.nzM
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            11
            ·
            1 year ago

            I suspect nothing about what National offered was what did it, other than the fact they were not Labour. I fully believe that the majority of people vote without knowing what policies they are voting for.

            • mojojojo@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              1 year ago

              I found that too. Any political conversation I had this cycle were basically: “Winston for the shit stir” or “Lifelong (insert party) voter”. Nobody I spoke to really knew any policy.

              • Dave@lemmy.nzM
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                9
                ·
                1 year ago

                I’ve been mentioning the cool Act policies in passing to people I talk with. No one knew that they want to remove all building standards, repeal the act that sets our carbon reduction targets, or allow employers to call everyone contractors to get around employee protections and so they don’t have to pay annual/sick leave, etc. I’ll be watching the coalition negotiations with interest.

              • HappycamperNZ@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                3
                ·
                1 year ago

                Yup - “oh why vote for those losers” yet when I asked what they disagree with they have nothing. I feel like alot of nationals vote was “i want something different”, a tax cut or lifetime members.

    • Mojojojo1993@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      Woo fucking hoo.

      Gotta love that for some reason a bunch of people have voted against their best interests. Think it’s time to reevaluate giving people decisions about their lives.

      It does not end well.

      • HappycamperNZ@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        I disagree- they voted in their short term interest with tax cuts and blaming labour for the state of things. Our country is lacking soo much, and this was people just wanting something to take the edge off now.

        • Mojojojo1993@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Take the edge of in what way ? Pretty short sighted if a couple months helps but then national policies kick in and things get markable worse. But who knows aye

          • HappycamperNZ@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            1 year ago

            Oh, it is shortsighted. But people can’t think about the future if they are struggling now and it is something we all do. 2k tax cut gives me something now, 100,000 homes in 10 years I have to wait for.

            • Mojojojo1993@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              1 year ago

              Which is probably why we are in this situation. We don’t look to the future. Gotta start thinking big picture. Planets fucked. Need some drastic changes or this is humanities end.

              But I get yah

              • HappycamperNZ@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                1 year ago

                Im curious what way you voted - I didn’t vote any of the big 4 because their focus is the 3 year reelection (and act/green is effectively a lab/nat vote). Don’t need to answer, just speaking out loud and happy to see others are on the same page.

                • Mojojojo1993@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  Unfortunately I’m eligible to vote( resident not citizen) but I would vote green.

                  Labour or green are an attack on national. Only way to fight national is to push up labour.

                  Two party systems are a big issue.

              • HappycamperNZ@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                4
                ·
                1 year ago

                Labour - no. But pushing things in a direction can facilitate construction. I’ve been seeing huge number of subdivisions come in, rezoning and growth up but it takes time and the global situation has been kicking everyone’s ass and there is little any NZ govt can do about it.

      • Ilovethebomb@lemmy.nz
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        I disagree, a lot of people seem to think having equal rights to any other NZer is in their best interests, and I think that’s a reasonable point of view.

  • Xcf456@lemmy.nz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    19
    ·
    1 year ago

    Cool, we get to watch an national/act government tonight, a no vote in Australia overnight and a genocide tomorrow

            • HappycamperNZ@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              1 year ago

              This is what our generation does. It is what it is, we just got to get up and deal while hopefully making it easier for the next one… or at least one less fire for them to put out.

              • Xcf456@lemmy.nz
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                1 year ago

                Fair enough, I respect that. I think what gets me is it doesn’t have to be this way but yeah, you gotta take it day by day.

                • HappycamperNZ@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  It doesn’t - but we bitch at the boomers for all they didn’t do and we should walk the talk. Make it harder for us to make it easier for the next.

    • zout@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      1 year ago

      Don’t forget the Polish elections tomorrow! It has all the drama of a modern election!

  • KhanumBallZ@lemmy.nz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    1 year ago

    Wait for the special votes. Back in 1999 - The Greens won 7 extra seats from special votes alone.

    • A special voter
  • SamC@lemmy.nz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    No party in the MMP era outside Labour/National had ever won more than 1 general electorate seat (i.e. besides the Maori seats) before this election. Now it looks like Act will win 2 and Greens will win 3… that seems like a significant moment.

  • HappycamperNZ@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    I hope NZ wins, but Chris has it in the bag. Unlike that prick Chris.

    Edit: not calling Hipkins a prick, but with the result it looks it.

    • Ilovethebomb@lemmy.nz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      Even in his electorate, he didn’t win with anywhere near the majority he has had previously. His stretch as PM has really hurt his popularity.

      • HappycamperNZ@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        1 year ago

        I think labour is reaping the consequences of protecting the country during covid. They did an amazing job and now its over the country forgot how much their choices did.

        • master5o1@lemmy.nzOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          1 year ago

          Pretty sure it’s all the other dropped balls they tried or barely tried to juggle.

          • HappycamperNZ@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            1 year ago

            Haven’t followed Hipkins too much, but I have believed Jacinda is a great person and empathic leader, but an average politician. Exactly what we needed in covid.

        • Ilovethebomb@lemmy.nz
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          I think it’s more to do with the long list of failed policies outside of Covid measures, and the racist policies being proposed by Greens and TPM.

            • thatsTheCatch@lemmy.nz
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              1 year ago

              I’ve tried to find this policy online but I haven’t been able to. Would you be able to provide a link?

              • HappycamperNZ@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                1 year ago

                Sorry, had a look through and was incorrect (hence the question mark).

                • allocate 50% of police, court and corrections funding to Maori authorities.

                • allocate 50% of new state houses to Maori.

              • HappycamperNZ@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                1 year ago

                So do I - make no mistake Maori were repressed and disadvantaged, but you can’t throw a policy out and expect it all to change.

  • Ilovethebomb@lemmy.nz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    1 year ago

    It’s looking like Blue Chris will win, a disappointing result for Red Chris.

    Serious though, this is a huge shift from last election, almost a 25% drop. And it looks like Winnie will be out in the cold, thankfully.

    • Munkisquisher@lemmy.nz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      1 year ago

      It’s the least inspiring election I’ve ever seen. Literally had no idea who was the least worst option stepping into the booth

    • Dave@lemmy.nzM
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      If you look at the cumulative votes graph, you’ll see there are a lot less voters this election. It makes me wonder what the shift would look like if everyone voted (or, what are the key demographics for people who don’t vote).

      • SamC@lemmy.nz
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        1 year ago

        Younger people usually much less likely to vote, and also tend to vote for the left, especially Greens. So yeah, it would make a huge difference most likely.

        • Ilovethebomb@lemmy.nz
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          1 year ago

          Greens have done surprisingly well so far though, although largely at Labour’s expense, it seems.

          • SamC@lemmy.nz
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            1 year ago

            They’ve done well, but I think they would really want to be in the 13-15% range. Still, looks like they’ll pick up 2-3 electorates, which would be huge.

              • SamC@lemmy.nz
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                1 year ago

                Maybe, but I doubt that made much difference to people who were realistically actually going to vote for them. This will likely be their best result ever.

                • Ilovethebomb@lemmy.nz
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  3
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  It’s amazing actually, the number of comments I’ve seen online from supposed green party supporters saying they don’t like them having a race quota, don’t support other aspects of their policies etc, but will still vote for them, is incredible.

                  Having said that, they do have some solid policies.

        • HappycamperNZ@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          1 year ago

          Which is quite disappointing consider the massive investment the future requires. Uni, health, general education and environmental funding just aren’t there and we are the ones who will be affected.

      • Ilovethebomb@lemmy.nz
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        At this point, I think he’ll be a politician until the day he dies, he’s got nothing else. I don’t see him retiring in the next three years.

      • Dave@lemmy.nzM
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        This is his life. He loves it, he’ll die before he gives it up.

  • Fizz@lemmy.nz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    1 year ago

    Its seems like a lot of area seats were lost because left wing votes were split between labour and greens which allowed national to snag it.

    • deadbeef79000@lemmy.nz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      I was about to try and point out that a party vote for greens is actually a party vote for a greens+labour coalition.

      Then realised that you’re referring to electorate votes.

      Derp.

  • absGeekNZ@lemmy.nz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    1 year ago

    Wow it sucks that TOP didn’t do better; but what sucks even more is that NZ Loyal got 1.15%; the crazys were out in force this year.

  • SamC@lemmy.nz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    1 year ago

    Hmm, there does seem to be a reasonably strong break towards Labour in the later counted votes. It could mean National end up with as low as 38% (especially after specials). If TPM win 5 seats, there’d be 122 MPs with overhang. That could mean National/Act will fall just short of a majority and require support from NZF.

    • sortofblue@lemmy.nz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Which would be making a bleak situation comically worse. The ol’ Kingmaker ends up wielding a lot more power than the 1-ish% influence the people meant for him to have.

  • TagMeInSkipIGotThis@lemmy.nz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    So going on how things changed as voters were counted, it would appear that the early voting broke more for Nat / Act, and then the day of voting broke for Lab / G. NZF & TPM stayed relatively consistent throughout the night. This makes sense, blue-collar working people are somewhat more likely to vote Labour than National, and are less likely to have time to get to one of the fewer advance voting posts, than the typically white-collar / retired voters who are somewhat more likely to vote for the right.

    The vote totals have now tightened up considerably on whether National can form a government with just Act; such that I am interested to know how many overseas / special votes there might be, and if any of them have been counted yet. If there’s enough of them, and they tipped more Labour/Green than National then it might be enough to pull another vote from the right to the left, and given Parliament has an overhang this term Luxon would need to pick up the phone to someone to get an outright majority, at least on confidence & supply.

    Another big talking point for me is that one in every twenty voters this election has no representation in Parliament at all due to the threshold requirements for minor parties.

  • Nath@aussie.zone
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Have you guys at least imported the democracy sausage tradition from the West Island, yet? It was super sporadic the last election I asked.

    No matter the result, voting is never a total loss if you have at least had this.

    • master5o1@lemmy.nzOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      I’ve never been at a voting place with a sausage sizzle.

      Then again, I’ve always worked at a voting place (except this year because children).