Former Republican congresswoman Liz Cheney slammed House Speaker Mike Johnson (R-LA) — stating she has “no faith” Johnson will “fulfill his constitutional obligations” as they pertain to certifying the 2024 election.

In an interview on NBC’s Meet the Press Sunday, moderator Kristen Welker — who had just interviewed Johnson moments earlier — brought in Cheney and asked her to weigh in.

“You just heard how the House Speaker answered my questions about whether he would certify the election results,” Welker said. “Do you have faith that this election will be free and fair and that there will be a peaceful transfer of power?”

Cheney proceeded to voice a complete lack of confidence that Johnson would certify the election if former President Donald Trump lost.


🗳️ Register to vote: https://vote.gov/

  • Ranvier@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    139
    ·
    3 days ago

    Also important to know, if democrats take back the house, Johnson would no longer be speaker at the time the presidential election is certified. It’s the next congress, not the current one, that will certify the vote. New congress is seated on January 3rd 2025, and the presidential election certification is on January 6th 2025.

    • disguy_ovahea@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      66
      ·
      edit-2
      3 days ago

      Exactly right. I almost typed the same thing before I read your comment.

      Congress writes the laws. They can even amend the Constitution with 2/3 majority. Whoever controls Congress controls the nation’s direction.

      Please vote.

      • SpaceCowboy@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        17
        ·
        2 days ago

        They can even amend the Constitution with 2/3 majority.

        I think 3/4 of the states also need to ratify those amendments.

        • generichate1546@lemmynsfw.com
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          2 days ago

          3/4ths of the states are needed to pass an amendment over the federal government or perhaps in spite of the federal government too.

      • Supervisor194@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        13
        ·
        2 days ago

        If they take control of both houses of congress, I would like to think one of the first things they would do is expand the supreme court with the justification that denying Obama an appointee was straight-up unforgivably unethical. And suspend the filibuster to do it.