Back in the Walter Cronkite Era, there was a thing called 'The Fairness Doctrine."
When broadcasting started with radio, there were a limited number of usable bands. The government assigned stations and laid down rules, including one that said that if you gave an editorial you had to let the other side respond. Another said that no one company could own more than two stations in a town [one AM and one FM]
After the Watergate scandal unseated Nixon, the Right realized that an independent press was a liability. As soon as Reagan got in he started trashing the old media rules and by 1996 the GOP Congress could finally destroy the old system.
You might want to watch the movie “Network.” As it aged it went from cutting edge satire to staid docudrama
The tax code is not codified in the constitution - free speech and free press is. the only reason the fairness doctrine was ever constitutional was because the public airwaves were a limited resource. That limitation does not exist on cable TV or the internet, so you’re going to have a huge uphill battle through the courts to make a Neo-fairness-doctrine for cable or social media constitutional.
Further, social media crosses international borders, so it’s a lot more difficult to wrangle and regulate as opposed to networks firmly operating only inside the bounds of the continental US.
Back in the Walter Cronkite Era, there was a thing called 'The Fairness Doctrine."
When broadcasting started with radio, there were a limited number of usable bands. The government assigned stations and laid down rules, including one that said that if you gave an editorial you had to let the other side respond. Another said that no one company could own more than two stations in a town [one AM and one FM]
After the Watergate scandal unseated Nixon, the Right realized that an independent press was a liability. As soon as Reagan got in he started trashing the old media rules and by 1996 the GOP Congress could finally destroy the old system.
You might want to watch the movie “Network.” As it aged it went from cutting edge satire to staid docudrama
our main issue today is with 24/7 cable news and social media, neither of which were ever governed by the fairness doctrine.
That’s kind of like say because Reagan cut taxes on the rich back in the 1980s we can’t change those laws.
We’re never going back to the Cronkite Era but the FCC still does regulate cable TV.
The tax code is not codified in the constitution - free speech and free press is. the only reason the fairness doctrine was ever constitutional was because the public airwaves were a limited resource. That limitation does not exist on cable TV or the internet, so you’re going to have a huge uphill battle through the courts to make a Neo-fairness-doctrine for cable or social media constitutional.
Further, social media crosses international borders, so it’s a lot more difficult to wrangle and regulate as opposed to networks firmly operating only inside the bounds of the continental US.
I’m mad as hell 😡
I want to know more!
[sorry, wrong meme]
You’re doing your part!