• GoddessNoAi@lemmynsfw.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      91
      ·
      7 days ago

      His point is that some people think killing is so wrong that they’ll actively advocate for a course of action that will kill waaaaay more people.

      You value your own moral purity over the lives of other people.

      That’s his point.

      • _bcron_@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        36
        ·
        7 days ago

        It’s the trolley problem:

        You have Gaza on one set of tracks

        On the other, you have Gaza, Ukraine, and potentially a whole lot of other stuff including anyone that’s ever registered Democrat (they’ll be able to pry voter registrations and if they do make good on building big-ass detention facilities one doesn’t need to be all that creative to imagine what they might eventually use them for)

        I don’t really wanna know what’s on that other set of tracks

        • sorval_the_eeter@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          4 days ago

          And you’ve got harris with full control over where the trolley goes, and a working set of brakes. So its not the trolley problem at all.

    • pixxelkick@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      48
      ·
      7 days ago

      You’re choosing between “lots of people being killed” vs “LOOOOOOTTTTTSSSS of people being killed”

      Based on your own morality you have outlined, ethically you would choose to vote Kamala then, as under her far far fewer people will die.

        • CarbonIceDragon@pawb.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          29
          ·
          edit-2
          7 days ago

          No demon at all has created it; other humans have. You aren’t the sole person responsible for responding to it, but your actions will contribute to what happens next, non-action included.

          You can say that this kind of situation implies someone else has done something wrong, leaving you holding the bag, and you’d be right, if nobody had done something wrong, we wouldn’t have a genocide to talk about in the first place- but saying that leaving you holding the moral bag was a wrong thing to do doesn’t change the fact that you are now holding that bag, along with all the rest of us. And about half of us (referring to the people of the US as a whole), if you haven’t noticed, have every desire of causing even more harm. “Neither” is simply not an option when failing to choose the least bad thing will result in someone else choosing the worse one. It’s not fair, it’s repulsive even, but the universe does not work in such a way as to ensure only fair moral choices exist. Morality is a thing we invented, the world doesn’t care about conforming to it.

          Getting the best outcome you have with the bad options presented you matters more than whether or not you feel your own personal hands are clean- because metaphorically clean hands will not save the people of Palestine, and likely would doom some, and others elsewhere, that could have been saved. A clean feeling conscience bought by leaving people you could have helped to die is little more than a delusion of innocence.

          • Samvega@lemmy.blahaj.zone
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            7 days ago

            It’s not fair, it’s repulsive even, but the universe does not work in such a way

            It’s not the universe, it’s the human world. This is a solely human problem, and I do not find myself emotionally attached to the idea of being human.

            • CarbonIceDragon@pawb.social
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              13
              ·
              7 days ago

              Neither do I, as I’m a transhumanist, but that is pretty much irrelevant to this, because how on earth do one’s feelings about one’s species even have any bearing on this?