• Furbag@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    5 hours ago

    Immigration is such a horseshit issue. Why are people dumb enough to fall for this shit?

    Immigration will be “solved” come January, but not because Trump will actually do anything about it, but he’ll just say the problem is solved and then stop talking about it.

    • djsoren19@yiffit.net
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 hours ago

      Because the Democrats picked it up and used it as an issue as well. Instead of dispelling the myths of “Bigrant Crime,” as if that would be a challenge, they took an anti-immigration stance as well. Honestly, Trump had a rare master class attack on the Dems with the whole “they’ve been in power for four years, why haven’t they already done everything,” because it called out just how shallow the Dems bending to conservative anti-immigrant policy was. It was almost certainly an accident on his part, especially since his party was the reason Dems couldn’t be as hard on immigration as they wanted, but it turned into effective messaging.

  • anticurrent@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    19
    ·
    9 hours ago

    You don’t win an election just with vibes.

    Kamala didn’t bring as much substance as what the left electorate was expecting from her, and couldn’t differentiate herself from Biden and the current term she is serving under. The whole democratic party went under because all they promise is vibes compared the current economical struggles people are facing.

    • lagomorphlecture@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      2 hours ago

      I was onboard with her but I honestly felt icky every time the Biden administration released a new statement about how good the economy is. How out of touch do you have to be to think the economy is good? Republicans have no intention of fixing that but at least they’re smart enough to see that people feel crushed in this economy and pander to it. And apparently that was a much bigger issue than abortion, which shocked me at first but as it settles I see that my fear as a woman pales in comparison to America’s fear of a woman and America’s struggling financial situation.

      • explodicle@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 hour ago

        How out of touch do you have to be to think the economy is good?

        Liberals measure the health of the economy by Gross Domestic Product (which has been going up), and Consumer Price Index (which includes big-screen TVs). You’d have to dismantle everything they paid to learn in college econ.

        “It’s easier to fool people than to convince them that they have been fooled.”

    • KneeTitts@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      7 hours ago

      The truth is the dems are a right wing party now, they’ve been dragged there by the rethugs… and people Want to vote for an Actual left wing party, but there literally isnt one in the US.

      • pound_heap@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        5 hours ago

        I don’t think people want to vote for a party. People want to vote for someone who’s making sense for them, and looks like for majority it was Trump this time.

        An “actual left wing party” must not only have ideology, but a sound plan on how to improve people’s lives and an ability to communicate this plan to people, loud and clear. Actually, as populists are now trusted everywhere in the world, the plan is less important than communication

        • KneeTitts@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          5 hours ago

          trumps ‘road to prosperity’ is tariffs… which will lead to a depression, maybe a global one. Thats a helluva plan there

          • lagomorphlecture@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 hour ago

            I didn’t read that as OP saying they believed that will work, I read it as saying the majority of Americans (or at least the majority of Americans who bothered voting) believed that.

      • M0oP0o@mander.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        7 hours ago

        The poison of the “big tent”. Move a little over to let people in enough and you are no longer representing anyone in a desperate attempt to represent everyone.

        • djsoren19@yiffit.net
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 hours ago

          between this and the enshittification of big tech and gaming, it feels like 2024 has been one big argument in support of gatekeeping.

          • M0oP0o@mander.xyz
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            2 hours ago

            Or you know, not gatekeeping but actually taking a position as a political party (instead of trying to be some grey nothing). Oh and having more then two parties would be nice.

  • AwkwardLookMonkeyPuppet@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    53
    ·
    12 hours ago

    Economy

    This is Trump’s economy, you idiots. This is the fallout from his incompetence and malice. But heaven forbid voters understand basic principles which rule their lives.

    • kava@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      38
      ·
      11 hours ago

      i think you give too much credit to Trump. the economy has been rigged against the working class for a long time. it’s just getting progressively more brutal which makes people feel increasingly insecure.

      an insecure working class elects strongmen who promise simple solutions

      • RobotsLeftHand@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        11 hours ago

        The best, simplest summation I’ve seen. Thank you. I’ve been searching for something to make sense of it and this is definitely it. Being forced into voting for the “least worst” candidate obscures where that path is headed by either candidate.

    • Semi-Hemi-Lemmygod@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      10 hours ago

      It’s the pattern in American politics that has existed since I was born: Republicans fuck the economy, Democrats do their best to fix it, people blame the Democrats for the bad economy and elect Republicans who fuck it up even more.

    • stoly@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      10 hours ago

      Worse: Congress purposely intended for the president to not have direct control over the economy.

      • AwkwardLookMonkeyPuppet@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        7 hours ago

        Right, but the administration’s actions typically get attributed to the president, plus the president does have a measure of control through executive orders, or proposals which get carried through the house and Senate. The president will obviously sign any initiative that they themselves proposed.

  • I Cast Fist@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    105
    ·
    15 hours ago

    I love how Economy is a high priority, yet they voted for the asshole known being the genius behind several bankruptcies. “The economy isn’t doing good, clearly we need someone who can fuck shit up to make it work!”

    • ℍ𝕂-𝟞𝟝@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      41
      ·
      15 hours ago

      Unironically, I think that was the thought process.

      Hard to vote for someone who is telling you all is well and the people that got the country here are competent and mean well, when the country is going through 5 different crises, all preventing you from living a decent life.

        • ryathal@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          9
          ·
          12 hours ago

          She didn’t have to defend it. This was an election to run over Biden until he was just a pile of goo. She could have came out with some strong contrasting policies, instead she gave some great sound bytes for Trump.

          • djsoren19@yiffit.net
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            1 hour ago

            It was such an easy lay-up to fumble. Hell, she raised millions in personal donations compared to a Trump campaign that ended up stiffing locations on payment because they’re so broke, it was the rare election where the Dems didn’t need their corporate donors. They could have accepted some long-term financial losses in the face of potential greater long-term gains if they could maintain similar levels of personal donations from energized progressives. I remember the energy in the air when Harris/Walz was revealed, it seemed like a progressive ticket could seriously exist.

            And then it all vanished. Thanks for taking my $20, assholes. Wouldn’t have bothered if I knew they’d just dance to their owners demands anyway.

            • ryathal@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              8 minutes ago

              Fumbling what should have been a cupcake question to talk about a major campaign promise is inexcusable.

  • FlashMobOfOne@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    36
    ·
    14 hours ago

    It’s simple, and history has borne this out many many times.

    In a bad economy, no one cares about your politics if you’re the candidate of change. There’s a reason why Harris spent two months repeating memes instead of defending Biden’s policies, because it’s impossible to defend the fact that you had four years to rule and there are more people working 2-3 jobs just to survive.

    They knew they needed to appeal to workers. Instead, they spent most of the campaign repeating this meaningless platitude about joy to people who are being worked to death.

    • kent_eh@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      11 hours ago

      In a bad economy, no one cares about your politics

      That’s no excuse for electing someone whose stated policies and politics will fuck the economy even further and faster.

      • jdnewmil@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        6 hours ago

        Sure it is, if you don’t understand economics, which few Merkins do. The evidence is right in front of us.

  • Wanderer@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    6 hours ago

    I guess this just goes to show what everyone is saying.

    The left is shooting themselves in the foot. People care about immigration and the left won’t solve it. So they lose power, that’s democracy in action.

    If the left want wants they need to listen to the concerns of the people.

    • djsoren19@yiffit.net
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 hour ago

      Not that you’re wrong with your conclusion, but you picked a bad issue to go on. Democrats won’t solve immigration because there’s nothing to solve. Immigrants are not committing crimes at a higher rate than the rest of the population, and while America gets a lot of migrants, we also have a collapsing birthrate and need a growing populace for infinite shareholder growth.

      The problem is that Republicans keep making up lies about immigration, even nonsensical lies like “they’re eating the dogs,” and the Democrats do nothing to dispel these lies. They don’t sit down with the charts that verifiably disprove the Republican bullshit. Instead, they pick it up, and promise they’ll be tougher on immigration next time, giving legitimacy to the lies.

    • grue@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      6 hours ago

      People care about their economic well-being (which “the immigrants” are just scapegoats for) and the liberals abjectly refuse to do anything about that.

      But that still doesn’t excuse anybody flushing the rule of law down the toilet.

      • Wanderer@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        6 hours ago

        But that still doesn’t excuse anybody flushing the rule of law down the toilet.

        Did i say it did?

        People obviously care note about immigration than that. That’s how high of a priority it is I guess.