• Liz@midwest.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    4 days ago

    Yes, actually. RCV is complicated enough that it causes poor NYC voters to submit invalid ballots at a higher rate than their rich and counterparts, something that doesn’t happen with “choose one.” Still, RCV is good, but Approval Voting is better. Under Approval, an invalid ballot is impossible unless you put in illegal markings, which would invalidate a ballot under any method.

      • Ashelyn@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        edit-2
        4 days ago

        You’re given a list of candidates, and you can select however many of them you approve of being in office. Votes are then tallied, and whoever has the highest approval total is who gets voted in.

        • stembolts@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          2 days ago

          So I don’t get to prioritize one candidate over the other? I can only vote “approve” or “disapprove”?

          These are rhetorical questions and I know the answers, but dang, you failed to explain the “ranked” part of “ranked choice”…

      • Liz@midwest.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        3 days ago

        Other folks have let you know what’s up. You can read more about it at https://electionscience.org/

        Personally I think their recent website remodel really took a lot of the meat and potatoes out of their presentation, but I’m not a media guru, so what do I know?

    • tyler@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      4 days ago

      Approval is good and should be used to move to either STAR or 3-2-1. RCV is barely better than Plurality and this ballot is just one example of how RCV implementations can cause issues.