• blazera@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    1 year ago

    If another country invades your country, certain parts of your own country are off limits to you i guess.

    • kbotc@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      20
      ·
      1 year ago

      Yes… that’s literally what “war crimes” are, and Hamas and Israel are speed running to see who can commit more:

        • kbotc@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          27
          ·
          1 year ago

          Using human shields is a war crime, holding civilians hostage is a war crime, perfidy is a war crime, using recognized medical organization’s infrastructure is a war crime (transporting military assets in an ambulance from Red Cross/Red Crescent is a major no no). On Israel’s side, targeting journalists is a war crime, and targeting civilian infrastructure is a war crime, civilian mass punishment is a war crime.

        • Ilovethebomb@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          20
          ·
          1 year ago

          Article 51(7) of Protocol I:

          The presence or movements of the civilian population or individual civilians shall not be used to render certain points or areas immune from military operations, in particular in attempts to shield military objectives from attacks or to shield, favour or impede military operations. The Parties to the conflict shall not direct the movement of the civilian population or individual civilians in order to attempt to shield military objectives from attacks or to shield military operations.

          That one.

            • Ilovethebomb@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              10
              ·
              1 year ago

              Israel, to their credit, are taking steps to avoid civilian casualties, including leaflet drops, phone calls, and the infamous “roof knocking”.

                • fosforus@sopuli.xyz
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  3
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  1 year ago

                  Being militarily more powerful does not imply that they don’t want to avoid civilian casualties. Fighting an enemy who primarily employ terrorist tactics causes a large amount of civilian casualties, and Gaza being one of the most densely populated areas in the world makes it even worse.

                  If we consider some sort of an upper limit how many civilians you theoretically could kill, there’s nazis. They killed 1,5 million jews in 100 days. And that’s only jews. Now, you don’t have to be redoing the holocaust in order to qualify for an atrocity of course, but Israel is definetely not trying to kill as many civilians as they can. This would look very different if they were.

                  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Demographics_of_the_State_of_Palestine#Demographics_of_the_Gaza_Strip – their population growth is #34 in the world.

    • cannache@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      If they had any sense they’d go for a one state solution with negotiation on how to create one set of laws for all and fix the shit they just blew up rather than keep bombing but hey man, people prefer to keep fighting just to save face