• kitnaht@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      29 days ago

      I’m pretty sure Java doesn’t have pointers, so writing a hello world application isn’t gonna fuck up nearly that hard.

      The one thing he forgot though is that your source file is probably in the folder

      com/companyname/net/classes/factory/factoryfactory/worker/lib/bin/refresh/jdk/model/ui/closebutton/press.java

      And spread out among a bunch of other directories, and the java file is like…3 lines. But there are 10k files spread all around directories like this that are all 3 lines a piece with a class definition.

      • Valmond@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        29 days ago

        They have sort of pointers, like references, that can be null…

        You just “new” stuff to it and let the “garbage” collector deal with freeing stuff up. When it feels like it.

      • perviouslyiner@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        29 days ago

        wait, so when .io gets deregistered, are a load of companies going to have to rename their root directories and rewrite all of their include statements?

        • kitnaht@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          29 days ago

          Thankfully, despite naming them like that, it doesn’t actually seem to have any real purpose. Apparently they just wanted to make sure that different companies making different libraries didn’t accidentally use the same name for their project…

          • Hawke@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            29 days ago

            That’s exactly the reason. And also no company is going through the bother to refactor that shit, so everything is named based on some other company 5 mergers and acquisitions ago.

    • Scott@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      29 days ago

      I’ve worked on a corporate project with multiple Java services, anon isn’t really exaggerating. Java can be a hell scape at times

      • taladar@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        29 days ago

        They forgot to mention that production Java applications apparently need to log a certain minimum number of completely meaningless stacktraces per hour to work properly. Or at least I assume that is the case from the fact that all of them do that.

        • HackerJoe@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          29 days ago

          Best with an old and vulnerable log4j on a Windows log server.

          We don’t know what’ll happen if we update. And we don’t know if the dude who coded it will answer our calls. YOLO!

        • Scott@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          28 days ago

          You would be surprised, errors right out of the box on a freshly initialized project aren’t uncommon

          • babybus@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            28 days ago

            As I’ve been working with Java professionally for years, you’re right, I would be surprised, because that would be really uncommon.

    • chunkystyles@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      29 days ago

      I’ve been programming in Java professionally for 11 years. It’s not just embellishment, it’s outright lying.

      Threads giving you race conditions? All concurrent programming will do that if you’re shit at it.

      Java has come a long way. I will admit that UI in Java is terrible. I would never do that.

      • extremeboredom@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        29 days ago

        It’s not accurate to accuse Anon of “lying,” when both their story and yours would point to the race conditions from threads being a symptom of someone who’s just learning the language.

        It’s not that serious though; because it’s a greentext, it is both artificial AND homosexual.

    • schteph@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      29 days ago

      Java is religiously backwards compatible. Modern java projects are not as enterprisey and boilerplatey, but, as jdk21 is backwards compatible with jdk1.3, you can still happily write code as if it’s 2003.

      Additionally, the java space is huge, so just wildly googling will probably not help you that much.

      • Hawke@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        28 days ago

        Is that why every single application will only work with some ancient version of Java?(usually 8, sometimes 1.6 or 11)

        I can’t think of many cases where Java 21 is a drop in replacement, and I don’t think anyone actually used 17.

    • darthelmet@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      29 days ago

      Only have a beginner perspective, but in school I did really well in intro CS class that used Python. 2nd class was in Java and it almost broke me I was so confused.

      • naeap@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        29 days ago

        Hated Java in school

        But before Java I learned a bit of Pascal and C/C++, and I’m so fucking happy that I’m currently working with C++ in my job and not with fucking Java

        I still hate it with everything I’ve got …