• teri@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    38
    ·
    1 day ago

    I support the cause in general but: Signal is not federated at all. It may seem like a decent alternative to WhatsApp but is it really? It still falls under the same US jurisdiction. Let’s say the US gov starts agressively prosecuting dissidents and certain minorities (they already do): can and should we still use signal in this case? I don’t think so. Sadly i can’t name a much better alternative. Maybe matrix. But it has other issues.

  • DicJacobus@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    37
    ·
    2 days ago

    instead of switching ive mostly just been ditching entirely. I need less time interacting with internet people.

    literally the only thing on this list im still using is facebook messenger, for my work colleagues. and youtube. everything else ive migrated (reddit-lemmy), or abandoned and torched

  • RedSnt@feddit.dk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    23
    ·
    2 days ago

    I was already on Mastodon by just having a Vivaldi (the chromium browser) account, and it’s just lovely I’ve spent most of the day setting up lemmy, even though I joined feddit.dk 2 years ago, it’s only just now I’m taking it seriously.
    And, while not related to the fediverse per se, I switched to linux a year ago.
    The only service that’s hard to drop/switch away from is Youtube imo.

  • PersnickityPenguin@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    2 days ago

    Are any of these actually good?

    I mean, aside from Lemmy. I tried Mastadon and no one was actually on it, seems like everyone is jumping to Bluesky.

  • breadcat@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    22
    ·
    2 days ago

    I keep seeing this type stuff but neither peertube or friendica are genuine replacements at this point, mastodon is weaksauce compared to akkoma or a misskey fork, and loops is alpha software. also yes signal is centralized but it just works and has contact discovery so it owns matrix and xmpp when compared to whatsapp. basically none of this stuff is truly ready

    • Esmoreit@lemmings.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      18
      ·
      2 days ago

      Loops will be open sourced later they say.

      Is Loops open source? It will be! We plan on open sourcing the platform after it reaches a stable and easy to maintain state.

      • tempest@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        20
        ·
        2 days ago

        That really is not a satisfying answer. It is incredibly nebulous and even if it did have a nice definition I guarantee most software developers will tell you a lot of software rarely reaches that state.

        I can see why they might want to avoid 1000 GitHub issues bike shedding things but they could open source the code and just not have open contribution

        • acockworkorange@mander.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          1 day ago

          Sometimes you’re ashamed of the ugly hacks you cobbled together to reach MVP, and you want to fix the stuff you know you need to fix first before being thrown to the wolves. I can respect that, for a limited time.

          • EuroNutellaMan@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            21 hours ago

            I mean maybe but you could also just say “we did some whacky shit here help us fix it please” and let the community help you in the effort. That’s the beauty of open source. Then again they may have their reasons and frankly I’m not even interested in a TikTok like social media so w/e as long as they don’t eat up their word it’s fine.

      • potentiallynotfelix@lemmy.fish
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        13
        ·
        2 days ago

        That means very little to me. Actions speak louder than words, and it would probably help the development of loops if it was actually open source.

          • supersquirrel@sopuli.xyz
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            1 day ago

            Which I think dansup should deserve our trust on this for quite a long time for doing. It isn’t empty promises if they already made Pixelfed and opensourced it.

            Like… I suppose it could be a grift, anything could but I see no reason to question their goals or motives.

        • ubergeek@lemmy.today
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 day ago

          For a lot of FLOSS projects, it’s common to keep the initial team small, so a product can be delivered fast, and gets opened up later.

          It’s to solve the “too many cooks” and prevent bikeshedding.

          A lot of corpo espionage is there solely to tank potential competitors, which include FLOSS projects.

  • Undaunted@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    90
    ·
    2 days ago

    Unfortunately, the switch from YouTube to PeerTube has not worked for me so far. I can’t find a decent instance (not full of right-wing/conspiracy content) with interesting stuff that also allows me to make an account.

      • namingthingsiseasy@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        13
        ·
        2 days ago

        Are we claiming now that Activity Pub is the only protocol that we can use for the fediverse? I think XMPP is roughly 30 years old at this point, and I’m pretty sure Activity Pub is much younger than that. I could be wrong though.

        But regardless, I don’t see why Activity Pub has to be the only protocol we accept to be considered a part of the fediverse. It’s not even like different AP implementations talk to each other all that well. My understanding is that Mastodon doesn’t federate that well with Lemmy, and I haven’t seen Loops or Pixelfed on Lemmy yet either.

        I’d be happy to be corrected on any of this though, I haven’t looked too closely into exactly how AP works or how it’s supposed to interoperate with different applications.

        • ubergeek@lemmy.today
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          2 days ago

          I mean, yeah… the fediverse, specifically, are AP servers, which is why we don’t include diaspora for it.

          It’s decentralized and federated, to be sure, just not the “fediverse”.

          • acockworkorange@mander.xyz
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            1 day ago

            Fediverse is about federation. It’s not Activityverse. So yeah, email, Usenet, IRC, XMPP, Matrix… all Fediverse, all an antidote to corporate walled gardens.

            Edit: not demeaning AP, it’s a great achievement and the services built upon it are a testament to its quality and forward-thinking.

            • ubergeek@lemmy.today
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 day ago

              I’m just saying that there’s deficiencies in those other networks. Just that they are different networks.

              Now if an xmpp user can directly message or communicate with a Mastodon user… then they’d be both part of the “fediverse”.

                • ubergeek@lemmy.today
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  1 day ago

                  Signal, no. And yes, Lemmy’s integration via AP is sub-perfect. Ie, I can (and do) follow communities on lemmy, with my Mastodon and pixelfed accounts.

                  So, work is needed, and only happens if a) same protocol is used, or b) bridge modules are used (like friendica does).

                  If someone made an xmpp bridge to talk AP, then it’s would be one big network, like how a lot of irc nets get bridged with xmpp nets, which makes those one, singular, federated network. But until they start speaking the protocol the rest of the fediverse does, it’s just another network.

                  And again, it’s not a bad thing. It’ll even probably get there eventually.

      • PeriodicallyPedantic@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        2 days ago

        I’d like to argue that using AP is an inconsistent rule for membership. For example, Diaspora has been considered to be part of the fediverse from early on, but it doesn’t use AP.

        I don’t really know where to draw the line. AP simply isn’t suitable for some applications, but it makes sense to include it for branding

        • ubergeek@lemmy.today
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          2 days ago

          I don’t know of anyone who include d*, accepting the tiny number of d* pods that also speak AP.

          I mean, nostr is also NOT part of the fediverse, but another federated and decentralized network.

          • PeriodicallyPedantic@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            2 days ago

            Both Wikipedia and fediverse.party consider Diaspora, and a handful of other (mostly defunct) protocols as being part of the fediverse.

            I don’t really like the use of AP to be a qualification of being in the fediverse. There must be a better way to qualify a platform, even if it means that use of AP is a natural consequence.

      • Matombo@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        2 days ago

        afaik ap is not a hard requirement for being in the fediverse, matrix is often included because it has the same federation idea

        • ubergeek@lemmy.today
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          2 days ago

          Then email is a part of the fediverse? UUCP nets? IRC nets?

          All federated, none speak AP.

          I think a good working definition is “speaks the w3c standard AP”. Otherwise, its totally lost its meaning.

    • Log in | Sign up@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      18
      ·
      2 days ago

      Absolutely, signal isn’t federated, but I don’t want my messaging app to be federated. I want my social media to be federated. Lemmy is good because it’s open. Signal is good because it’s shut.

      • acockworkorange@mander.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 day ago

        That’s your preference and there’s nothing wrong with it. Doesn’t make Signal a Fediverse alternative. Matrix fits that use case.

        I prefer my messaging to be federated for the same reason I don’t want my other services depending on the benevolence of a single actor. But that’s me.

      • acockworkorange@mander.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 day ago

        the author literally picked random projects from github tagged as matrix, without considering their prevalence or whether they are actually maintained etc.

        if you actually look at % of impacted clients, it’s tiny.

        meanwhile, it is very unclear that any sidechannel attack on a libolm based client is practical over the network (which is why we didn’t fix this years ago). After all, the limited primitives are commented on in the readme and https://github.com/matrix-org/olm/issues/3 since day 1.

        From your link.

        • e8d79@discuss.tchncs.de
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 day ago

          That is exactly what it says. They knew about security issues in their library and didn’t fix them for years. This isn’t being ignorant, this is negligence.

        • e8d79@discuss.tchncs.de
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          2 days ago

          I do, use Signal if you care about privacy. They are the only game in town when it comes to reasonably secure chat software. Sure, I would prefer a federated alternative but I haven’t found one yet that is always end-to-end encrypted, open source, implements forward secrecy, and is user friendly enough to be used by my grandmother.

            • e8d79@discuss.tchncs.de
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 day ago

              SimpleX is cool, but fails the “my grandmother can use it” requirement. Signal has the huge benefit that is just as easy as WhatsApp. With Simplex you have to invite each of your friends individually.

                • e8d79@discuss.tchncs.de
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  ·
                  1 day ago

                  With Signal you just have to install the App and make an account to start chatting with your friends and family. SimpleX requires me to send a link or QR code to everybody I want to interact with. You will have a hard time convincing anyone to do that. Compare that to the first Twitter exodus, people chose Bluesky over Mastodon because picking a server was ‘difficult’. The average person doesn’t care about technology at all and will always pick the path of least resistance.

  • ERROR: Earth.exe has crashed@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    55
    ·
    edit-2
    2 days ago

    Youtube is probably the one that you can’t “Just Switch To Fediverse”

    Youtube content is mainly by creators. If they won’t leave, there will be no transition. And unlike reddit posts, you can’t just reupload. Because they will copyright strike you and take it down. Also, videos take up a lot more space than just text and some low-res memes like reddit-type sites.

    reddit is essentially a bunch of strangers talking to people, moving froms stranger Group A to stranger Group B is very easy to do. The reddit > Lemmy transition is probably one of the easiest. You’re just joining a new group of strangers.

    For everything else, your contacts will also need to switch.

    For Mastodon, the people you follow will also need to switch. This is even harder than getting your friends to switch.

    • TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      28
      ·
      2 days ago

      Hear me out.

      Creators should be hosting peer tubes. And they should host exclusively their own content. Fans of their can subscribe to whatever systems they want to pay and support.

      For creators, it’s a backup for when YouTube the project inevitably fails. For fans as well. But it’s also a backup of their content.

      • Statick@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        17
        ·
        edit-2
        2 days ago

        Tech-savvy content creators, sure…

        Your average content creator that wants to make Minecraft videos? Unrealistic.

        I hate the monopoly Youtube has, but all of the federated alternatives have a learning curve the general public isn’t willing to deal with.

        • Natanox@discuss.tchncs.de
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          2 days ago

          Not to mention it lacks any (ethical) monetization options. And the app is absolutely rudimentary, lacking even basic functionality.

          Framasoft made it clear they don’t want to make it a Youtube alternative though, however it could be through plugins. So there’d have to be a company or cooperative using it as a base to build upon, which is actually realistic. Especially European ones; not because Asia wouldn’t be interested in being more independent on the US as well, but because Framasoft is from France and Europe actively works towards this goal anyway with lots of money behind it.

    • acockworkorange@mander.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      1 day ago

      Remember the early days of YouTube? When people made garage videos for fun? Remember Vines? When people were making videos instead of businesses making content?

      That’s what Peertube is for. It’s to have fun. Showcase your high school band. Talk about your potted plants. Share your excitement about trains. It’s not to make money. It’s to live.

    • umbraroze@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      2 days ago

      For Mastodon, the people you follow will also need to switch. This is even harder than getting your friends to switch.

      Well I switched from the birdsite to Mastodon because a) I like to shout in the void and b) see what other people are shouting into the void. Doesn’t really ultimately matter who’s doing the shouting. People who go to social media exclusively for news and updates are a bit strange when you really think about it. You’ve got to have the shout in you.

      (I’m only being half facetious here)

    • RandomVideos@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      2 days ago

      A lot of youtubers make a living posting videos.

      They dont have a good enough reason to risk going to a much smaller audience with no ads and no membership system

      They also probably arent knowledgeable enough about computers to switch

      • acockworkorange@mander.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 day ago

        You don’t need to have a YouTube login to watch those. But you can join Peertube to post your content that you make without money as an end goal.

    • jonjuan@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      2 days ago

      You also can’t just switch from whatsapp to signal. I have hundreds of contacts on whatsapp that message me constantly there, and 2 on signal.

      • desconectado@ursal.zone
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 days ago

        @jonjuan That’s totally true! I tried to use WhatsApp just for work and Telegram for my friends and contacts, but only my wife and mom were talking to me there 😂. However, I think it’s important to keep talking to people about alternatives. That way, we can switch from this “proprietary web” to a free one.