• Railcar8095@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    2 hours ago

    Nice! Where was the turnout during the nationals?

    I’m tired of these news, of we follow what’s shared here we would have destroyed the Republicans, and they are useless and everybody hates them…

    But here we are.

    • JeeBaiChow@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      4 hours ago

      OTOH I’d want to know which dema sat it out as a virtue signalling exercise, and now act all indignant blended into the crowd now the rest are up in arms (figuratively, of course). It’s like oh yeah, back then it wasn’t such a big deal to take control of your govt, blame the system blah blah blah.

      • Semjaza@lemmynsfw.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        4 hours ago

        Getting involved in actual politics at a local level is better long run than voting in big elections.

        The latter is damage control. The former long run positive change.

  • meowmeowbeanz@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    39
    ·
    9 hours ago

    Avoiding constituents is peak cowardice—if you can’t face voters, you shouldn’t hold office.

    🐱🐱🐱🐱🐱

    • LeninOnAPrayer@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      7 hours ago

      I guess I’m an ignorant fuck because I thought that these town halls were required by law in some way. It’s insane they can just be like “nah, not gonna show up”. It should be an instant impeachment by law.

      • pyre@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        3 hours ago

        yeah the law should just automatically depose cowards who don’t face their constituents.

        unfortunately we sort of have a “who watches the watchers” situation here. expecting lawmakers to make laws to police themselves is ridiculous. idk what can be done for that honestly. the French had some ideas back in the day though.

        • musubibreakfast@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          2 hours ago

          The American Revolution inspired the French Revolution, hopefully the French Revolution can inspire an American Revolution.

    • gravitas_deficiency@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      28
      ·
      edit-2
      14 hours ago

      Bold of you to assume we’ll be allowed to have mid-terms

      Edit: that’s just me being snarky. Keep fighting the good fight. Vote in every fucking election that you can, at every level you can - federal, state, and local (and, if you’re an investor, shareholder - that, I think, is an under emphasized vector here). Be an activist in every way you can, through every path available to you.

    • JeeBaiChow@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      4 hours ago

      Yeah, but Gaza! I think I’ll sit it out again to show them!

      /s cuz apparently even dems online don’t understand sarcasm

    • eestileib@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      11 hours ago

      We need people telling at them, and we need people politely approaching them with the same policies.

      A game of good constituent/bad constituent, if you will.

    • TammyTobacco@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      12 hours ago

      People probably won’t need to yell at them if the Democrats actually are listening to and engaging with the voters.

      • formulaBonk@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        11 hours ago

        If they engaged with their voters, we wouldn’t have any democratic representatives over age of 65. Anything past that is just posturing and self enrichment

        • CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          11 hours ago

          What’s with the ageism? I want Democratic representatives of any age, as long as they have the right policies and they are of sound mind. People over the age of 65 will be just fine with me, thanks.

            • CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              8 hours ago

              Why do you have to draw the line somewhere?

              I feel like a broken record here, but the huge uptick in ageism I see in relation to politics seems like it’s not going to, ahem, age well given the amount of things I keep seeing about slowing down/reversing aging…

              I mean, yeah, it sounds kind of silly until it doesn’t. I remember reading about/thinking about things like AI (even if it’s not AGI - things like LLMs are here and disrupting the shit out of things). Same with self-driving cars. And yeah, neither of these things are perfect, but they are having an effect on society - people I know mostly got very smug and dismissive about these notions just 20 years ago. They are rather quiet about them now. I think the same thing is true about aging. Even if the breakthroughs are extremely mild and stay that way for decades, maybe even forever, suppose average healthspan is increased even 5 years. That will make (upper) age limits look very myopic and dated.

              • krashmo@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                4
                ·
                8 hours ago

                It’s not about how long you live so much as getting stuck in your ways. Old people don’t learn new things and adapt the way young people do. Humans solidify the way they do things in their 20s, make some fine tuning in their 30s/40s, and then pretty much stick to those habits for the rest of their life. With the way technology is progressing we can’t have stagnant people leading an evolving society.

                There are exceptions to every rule but that doesn’t mean statistics aren’t valuable information to base decisions on. Do you want people stuck in the past making laws about the future?

              • Deceptichum
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                edit-2
                7 hours ago

                So you’d be fine with a child holding the role? After all why draw a line. Age relates to capability on both ends.

  • NABDad@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    18
    ·
    13 hours ago

    Great. Now the Democrats can have everything lined up to take over during the midterms and…change nothing.

    • Cryophilia@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      8 hours ago

      Last time we had a filibuster proof majority was in 2009 for two different periods of two months each.

      Essentially Republicans have either been in power or had enough power to stop Democrats for the entire voting lives of most people on this sub.

      • LeninOnAPrayer@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        6 hours ago

        It’s crazy that there are people still using this line. I’m sorry but when was the last time the Republicans had a “filibuster proof majority”. They seem to be doing really well in getting their policies passed.

        The Democratic party is an absolute failure in providing the policies that they pretend to want. I’m so tired of hearing this “there is nothing we can do”.

        It’s like the Democrats are sitting here constantly complaining that “a dog can’t play basketball” while they get dunked on by a dog over and over.

        We are at this stage BECAUSE the Democrats are trying to “play by the rules” that the Republicans threw out the fucking window decades ago. We have DOGE and people are still using this “filibuster” excuse for a pathetic excuse for a resistance party. Stop defending their incompetence!

      • Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        7 hours ago

        Last time we had a filibuster proof majority was in 2009 for two different periods of two months each.

        Any time during which democrats possessed a simple majority, they could have done away with the filibuster forever. Stop making excuses.

        • LeninOnAPrayer@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          5 hours ago

          We will. It will not matter. Congress will likely be powerless by that point. Or a large portion of the Democratic party will align with the fascist policies by then as their donors place more pressure on them. We know how much democrats love to “reach across the isle”.

          Keeping up the illusion of democracy is the one of the most important things for the bourgeoisie to maintain. They will go through the charades for sure.

          It’s more important that people see through the charades of our system. I’m hoping that starts happening more.

          I feel like everyone is waiting for a “moment” to get them off their couch. By the time that moment happens it’s already too late.

  • Buffalox@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    21
    ·
    edit-2
    14 hours ago

    I bet the Democrats are using the momentum to send a stern message. And the press will proudly feature articles of how the Democrats SLAMMED the white house!! And the White house will barely notice, and go on doing what they are doing.

    • speckofrust@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      49 minutes ago

      Exactly. Anyone who thinks the Dems will save them is delusional. It’s time to move beyond a two-party system, and especially a system in which the two parties are right wing and ultra-right wing.

    • Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      9 hours ago

      Hopefully they’ll have something worth turning out for. Let’s see if you become hostile to the suggestion that democrats need to become better in order to appeal to voters.