Summary

Brian Thompson, CEO of UnitedHealthcare, was fatally shot in a premeditated attack outside the New York Hilton Midtown before speaking at an investor conference.

The gunman, still at large, fired multiple times, leaving shell casings marked with the words “deny,” “defend,” and “depose.”

Authorities suggest Thompson was targeted but remain unclear on the motive. His wife confirmed prior threats against him.

Analysts speculate a possible vendetta tied to his company. The case raises questions about executive security, as Thompson lacked personal protection despite known risks.

  • Chaotic Entropy@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    147
    ·
    7 days ago

    The case raises questions about executive security

    Thankfully it doesn’t raise any questions about the place of billionaire CEOs of companies making life and death decisions for the general populace for the sake of their overflowing pocket book. Boy would that be awkward.

    • C126@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      7 days ago

      Just curious: do you know any life or death decision he personally made that wasn’t the result of hundreds of bean counters crafting policy over many years? I find it hard to believe the ceo rubber stamped any decision like that, or even that he was aware of the details of any individual case.

      • ricecake@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        55
        ·
        7 days ago

        The CEO is ultimately responsible for the actions of the company. That’s literally their job. They set policy, direction and strategy, and if we’re to listen to what CEOs say they do,they also set the tone, attitude and energy of the company.

        So unless the denials that resulted in death were done in opposition to corporate policy, the CEO is responsible for them.

        Additionally, there was literally nothing stopping him from pushing a company policy of, as a thought, approving all claims involving minors, changing approval standards to only deny when the treatment was unequivocally unnecessary after a verbal consultation between the patients doctor and the insurance review doctor, and moving the balance of claim review to fraud investigation to recoup money after instead of denying upfront.

        • C126@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          7 days ago

          He’s only been there since 2021. These policies don’t show up overnight. How do you know he wasn’t working to change these policies?

          • I Cast Fist@programming.dev
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            19
            ·
            7 days ago

            Being in charge since 2021 means he got to decide at least some policies during the pandemic, which arguably could’ve caused even more harm if he wanted to deny a portion of claims solely to keep shareholders happy

          • ricecake@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            15
            ·
            6 days ago

            First, because I’m not naive and know that CEOs don’t get large bonuses and stock grants for doing stuff like that, particularly not in the US health insurance industry.
            Second, we know that since he started there they began programs like using AI in a fashion that had a preposterously high denial rate, and actively hurt elderly people.
            this case, and others like it continued to happen during his tenure.
            Finally, a company wouldn’t do a program like that without mentioning it, since it would clearly make them a more appealing insurer.

            Even if he didn’t put the policies in place, he’s still responsible for the conduct of the company under his supervision, and there’s no indication he did anything other than act like what you would expect from an insurance company CEO. Maximizing profits by denying healthcare.

      • Chaotic Entropy@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        42
        ·
        7 days ago

        Decisions that led to his company having the worst denial rate nationwide and the decision to wholly adopt an AI system that is known to have a 90% error rate to achieve it. Overflowing profits and bonuses sank right in to his pockets for his business acumen, and the key thing you do to earn that CEO payday is sign off on everything and be culpable when the shit hits the fan.

      • sudo@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        12
        ·
        6 days ago

        Yes the machine of human misery and death was already constructed before Mr Thompson got into the drivers seat. What’s you’re point? That he somehow didn’t know it was a death machine?

        • C126@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          6 days ago

          Strange to me that people are celebrating this guys death without knowing him or anything about how much his actions caused the issues with uhcs policy. He was handed the reign and therfore deserved death is the general tone here. Seems unjust and evil to me. I wouldn’t wish murder on anyone, worrying so many seem to disagree.

          • sudo@programming.dev
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            6 days ago

            No one actually gives a shit about Brian Thomas personally. People see “United Healthcare CEO dead” and they say “good”. Maybe you’re not from the US but its not strange at all.

        • werefreeatlast@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          7 days ago

          Preexisting bullets have somehow migrated thru his ass. Had he checked with his doctor before they would have caught the bullets. Unfortunately there’s nothing we can do…except maybe monopoly! Or how about a game of checkers? Or tictactoe?

      • NotMyOldRedditName@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        edit-2
        7 days ago

        CEOs of these companies will say things along the lines of find a way to deny an extra X% of claims this year, our profits are down!

        Edit: and I wouldn’t be surprised if they said something like or find a reason to deny that will get overturned if looked at further but maybe they won’t fight back hard enough.

  • 01011@monero.town
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    123
    ·
    edit-2
    7 days ago

    I finally understand what certain people mean when they talk about “good guys with guns”.

  • Dasus@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    112
    ·
    7 days ago

    Authorities suggest Thompson was targeted but remain unclear on the motive.

    Friggin Sherlock Holmes’ over here.

    The case raises questions about executive security

    “We won’t be pressured into changing the system we’ll just protect the rich exploiters better”

  • Itdidnttrickledown@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    94
    ·
    7 days ago

    Its simple all you clueless colombos. Just start investigating all denied claims where the person died at a result. Shouldn’t take more than a decade or so to go though that list.

  • Milk_Sheikh@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    103
    ·
    7 days ago

    Despite a fairly obvious motive in general before this news broke, and now confirmation it was because of their policies, they are doing zero soul searching or reexamination of why their policies became a motive

    Thompson’s killing quickly sent shockwaves through the corporate world, with corporate security heads gathering in a conference call to Wednesday.

    “Many of my colleagues today are sitting down with their executive protection team leaders, their security leadership teams, and re-evaluating what they are doing and not doing,” Dave Komendat, president of Seattle-based Komendat Risk Management Services

    Who had neo-Pinkertons on their 2020s bingo?

      • Dasus@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        21
        ·
        7 days ago

        I was amazed to learn this one time.

        Pinkertons always sounded such a Old Western thing, then I googled them or something and realised I see their patrol cars and guards most days. (Securitas operates in Finland.)

        • lud@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          16
          ·
          edit-2
          7 days ago

          Yeah, Securitas are huge. They are the second largest private security company in the world by revenue (the largest being G4S). I didn’t know they were THAT big until recently when I watched an investigate news/documentary report (by UG) on them

          It should however be noted that Pinkerton apparently operate as a subsidiary and does investigative and other Pinkerton stuff like normal. The Securitas you probably think of when you hear Securitas is still Securitas and not Pinkerton.

    • Marleyinoc@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      7 days ago

      I mean they could stop hi fiving in the boardroom when their AI is denying care to people who have paid for insurance all of their lives.

      I don’t think murdering people in the street is a just act, though. Mainly because of same reason I didn’t think the government should be killing people–the error rate is too high and someone innocent gets killed.

      The Punisher would be a lot less cool of he left a trail of innocent people behind.

      That said, when I saw this happen I immediately thought of the UniteHealth AI denying elderly care story I had read the day or morning before.

      Healthcare boardrooms across the country have probably been celebrating the idea they can deny people like they’ve always done PLUS blame it on a computer, now. High five 🙏

  • IndustryStandard@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    120
    ·
    edit-2
    7 days ago

    I sure hope nobody copies this behavior of retribution against the billionaire class which is responsible for almost all of the worlds suffering.

    Thoughts and Prayering so hard right now.

  • taiyang@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    97
    ·
    7 days ago

    To those upset that this is headline news because he’s rich, remember that exposure breeds copycats.

        • Bronzebeard@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          9
          ·
          7 days ago

          Or maybe a sauce that’s not owned by a decent sized corporation pulling in 10s of millions a year…?

          • Lennny@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            7 days ago

            Homemades the way to go for sure but idgaf what BBQ sauce someone decides to use. I didn’t say use fucking kc masterpiece.

            • Bronzebeard@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              7 days ago

              I didn’t say you did. I was specifically commenting on the sweet baby Ray’s.

              If you’re going to eat the rich, don’t give more money to the rich when you season them…

              • AngryCommieKender@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                6
                ·
                7 days ago

                ¾ cup yellow mustard

                ½ cup honey

                ¼ brown sugar

                ½ cup apple cider vinegar

                1 tablespoon of ketchup

                1 tablespoon Worcestershire sauce

                1 teaspoon garlic powder, or ½ tsp fresh finely minced garlic

                ¼ teaspoon cayenne pepper powder

                ½ teaspoon salt

                For extra spice ½ teaspoon or more of your favorite hot sauce.

                Combine in a saucepan, and whisk together till smooth

                Heat to a simmer, and low simmer for 10 minutes, stirring constantly

                Store in the fridge overnight.

              • Zink@programming.dev
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                7 days ago

                Surely you’d make an exception if the mass-market seasoning used on a CEO was sold by that CEO’s own company!

  • Blackmist@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    60
    ·
    7 days ago

    Authorities suggest Thompson was targeted but remain unclear on the motive.

    Aye, that sure is a mystery for the ages. Maybe he cut somebody up in traffic?

    • sylver_dragon@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      7 days ago

      There’s a gulf of difference between jumping to an obvious conclusion and actually doing the investigative work to really answer the question. The police aren’t dumb and are probably just as sure as the rest of us as to the motive that will be found. However, they still need to make that determination based on real evidence, especially if it’s going to go to court. So, “it’s unclear” until they have something which provides strong evidence of a motive.

      Ya, I’d be putting all my chips on this being someone who was on the receiving end of a denied claim. But, you never know when it’s going to end up being the guy failing to pay up to the Russian Mafia or some other situation which resulted in a targeted attack. I’m not going to defend all the actions of the police, but they do occasionally stop shooting kids long enough investigate crimes properly.

  • Ellen_musk_ox@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    57
    ·
    7 days ago

    The case raises questions about executive security,

    Of course this is the lesson. Not that everyone hates you, your company, the business, etc. It’s not our actions. We just need security.

    • demizerone@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      7 days ago

      Pretty soon they are going to need security droids like those in the movie Elysium. They are already working on that.

  • tyrant@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    49
    ·
    7 days ago

    To those complaining this is news because this is a rich white CEO and shouldn’t be. It’s fascinating to me because it seems like vengeance. It seems like it was well planned. It seems like the killer may have had a personal beef with the insurance company. I don’t usually follow things like this but I think insurance companies are genuinely evil. This one has my interest.

    • Scrollone@feddit.it
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      7 days ago

      Imagine how interesting it would be if more copycats started killing evil rich people all around the world…

      French Revolution vibes intensify…

  • not_that_guy05@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    43
    ·
    7 days ago

    Insurance companies hate this one trick.

    But no honestly, why are they acting like CEOs are fucking important?

    Just parasites is all they are.